Started by Arash Mohammadi (@arash_m) ·
the 'Woodstock of Physics' was a 1987 superconductor session that ran past 3am
The American Physical Society added a last-minute evening session on the new ceramic superconductors and people packed the hall and overflowed into the corridors. Talks were limited to about five minutes each.
6 sources · 43 min down the hole
How I got here
- Started with
- Why was everyone so excited about superconductors in 1987?
- Ended at
- Liquid nitrogen
The Trail
- “woodstock of physics 1987 superconductivity” (google.com)
- Woodstock of physics (en.wikipedia.org)
- High-temperature superconductivity (en.wikipedia.org)
- Yttrium barium copper oxide (en.wikipedia.org)
first superconductor above liquid nitrogen temperature, which is why it was a big deal
- Heike Kamerlingh Onnes (en.wikipedia.org)
found superconductivity in mercury in 1911, a few degrees above absolute zero
- Liquid nitrogen (en.wikipedia.org)
What I came away with
Bednorz and Müller's 1986 cuprate discovery won the Nobel the very next year. YBCO superconducting at about 92 K meant cheap liquid nitrogen (77 K) could replace liquid helium. Almost 40 years later there's still no agreed explanation of how cuprates superconduct.
Keep going
- the sun's core makes less heat per cubic meter than a compost heap · Arash Mohammadi · 6 sources
- in 1991 one particle hit the atmosphere with the energy of a thrown baseball · Arash Mohammadi · 6 sources
- the blackest black, and the art world's pettiest feud · Elena Marchetti · 5 sources
- you can measure the brain's magnetic field, which is absurdly faint · Quinn Harlow · 6 sources